And God Created SOUND!

        For many years, a favourite hobby of mine has been Bible “apologetics”. No, this doesn’t mean apologizing for the Bible! What it does mean is studying various Bible events, or stories or sciences and trying to understand them in the light of current attitudes and knowledge.

        For instance, in another article, we looked at the wonder of light—God created it and made us able to see and appreciate it. He makes it come at us in colour. He brings it to us undimmed, from the farthest star. And yet He shuts it off for a few hours each night for peace and rest.

        This spring, I’ve particularly noticed how the sunlight enhances all the colours of the leaves as they burst out—every shade of green, yellow, burgundy, and even touches of red—God is a great Artist!

        But now I want to think about sound—the murmur of a creek, the rustle of leaves in a breeze; or some bigger sounds: thunder itself, the crash of Niagara Falls, the outburst of Old Faithful. The list could go on for pages—think of the happy songs of a robin every morning or the whirr of a heat bug all summer. We’re told that even whales sing.

        All this leads us to the astounding fact that, just as God created light, He also created sound. We’re not thinking so much of the individual sounds we’ve just listed, but “sound” itself. We know that sound is vibrations of different frequencies, hitting on our eardrums. But we could have been made with no eardrums—what a different world that would be.

        And so, we come around to our starting topic of “apologetics”. I’ve found that there are theologian/philosophers who make an argument for the existence of God from what they call ‘Aesthetic Experience’. For instance, Peter Kreeft, in his Pocket Handbook of Christian Apologetics in all seriousness gives this argument in only three lines:

            “1. There is the music of Johann Sebastian Bach.

              2. Therefore there must be a God.

              You either see this one or you don’t.”

        John Stott says a similar thing when he finds himself worshiping during Handel’s Messiah.

        Let me just add my own experience. I love John Newton’s hymn “Amazing Grace”—bagpipes, orchestra, or choir, it sounds wonderful. In particular, Judy Collins sang it with the Harlem Boys Choir at an outdoor concert in 1993. She sang it with enjoyment and great feeling; in the singing, she included the boys’ voices and thousands in the audience. She wasn’t even afraid to use the word “wretch” about herself. But as she finished! —the words were hardly necessary, or the instruments, or even her name as the soloist—the music—the music was heavenly. That one of God’s creatures can produce such beauty! God is a great Musician!

“Cleverly devised stories”

     I was working my way through the two letters of the Apostle Peter, when I came across his statement, “We did not follow cleverly devised stories when we told you about the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ in power, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty.” (2 Peter 1:16) 

     One of the ways my wife and I like to relax in the evening is just that—we watch a mystery cleverly devised by Agatha Christie, or Dorothy Sayers, or G.K.Chesterton. The story is always entertaining and we can very seldom guess who the culprit is. For instance, last evening we watched a re-write of The Lady Vanishes—one mis-direction at the start followed by 75 minutes of well-written, well-acted plot. Then it seems like the director was told that all his money was gone and he had better finish quickly. Suddenly ‘a god jumps out of a box’, turns things around, and the story is over. At this point, however, we tend to look back and say “that part was well-written” or “well-acted” or “the director did a great job.” On the other hand, sometimes we say, “that part of the story went nowhere”, or “why did the vagrant do it?”, or even “why did the butler do it?” The plot-line is critical and the ability of a writer is judged by how well his plot holds together. 

     In a similar way, life is a story, with multiple plot-lines. But life, of course, is what really happens so there is no artificiality. This is what Peter means when he tells us of his own experience—Jesus was transfigured right before his eyes and he heard the voice of God, “that came from heaven when we were with him on the sacred mountain.” (2 Peter 1:18) 

     By definition, we would have to say that truth can have no plot-holes. Christians therefore base the whole field of “apologetics” on this principle. Opponents point out gaps in the Christian story and claim these are real holes in the plot. We Christians accept most of the story by faith, but we do like to see some of the gaps filled. 

     A small example of a supposed plot-hole in scripture might be the size of the tank in 1 Kings 7:23. It was 30 cubits in circumference and 10 cubits in diameter. On the face of it (but not in fact), that makes pi equal to 3.0000. 

     A really big plot-hole would be the death of Jesus on the cross, then seeing Him talking to the disciples in the closed room three days later. What a plot-hole this is! This is life from the dead—for Him and for us too! Only God can explain this plot-line. This is resurrection. Other hard things to understand are prophecy, miracles, the incarnation, the virgin birth, and the ascension. The point of these stories is that they are true. Christians have seen them, believe them, and have honestly reported them. The plot-line is true. 

He Once Was Dead!

1. Sweet is the savour of His Name 

Who suffered in His people’s stead;

His portion here, reproach and shame:

He liveth now; He once was dead.

2. He once was dead; the very same

Who sits on yonder throne above;

Who bears in heaven the greatest Name,

Whom angels serve, whom angels love.

3. He once was dead; the very same

Who made the worlds—a work of power,

Who now upholds the mighty frame,

And keeps it till the final hour.

4. He once was dead; but now He lives,

His glory fills all heaven above;

Its blessedness to heaven He gives,

The fountain He of joy and love.

5. His people shall His triumph share,

With Him shall live, and with Him reign;

In heaven their joy is full, for there

They see THE LAMB for sinners slain.

        This hymn, left as “anonymous” in our hymnbook (Believers’ Hymn Book #256), actually appears as HYMN DCXXXIX [639] in Hymns on Various Passages of Scripture, by Thomas Kelly (published in 1853), and it is he who should be credited with its authorship. 

        Kelly referenced Revelation 1:18, “I am alive for evermore,” and included two more verses between 3 and 4, above: 

He once was dead, the very same

Who soon will come with glory crowned;

His breath shall kindle then a flame

That shall consume the world around.

He once was dead, the very same

At whose command the dead shall rise,

To sorrow some, and endless shame,

And some to everlasting joys.

        Thomas Kelly was born in Dublin on July 13, 1769, the son of a judge of the same name, residing at Kellyville House, Athy. We know little of his mother or of his childhood, other than the simple statement, “his primary education was obtained at Portarlington and Kilkenny. He received his secondary education at Trinity College of Dublin University.” After graduation, he intended to study law so he transferred to the Temple bar in London. Here he encountered Hutchinson’s Moses’ Principia, with the consequent need to study Hebrew. This in turn led him to William Romaine’s works and a determination “to forsake the world and all its attractions and take up the study of theology.” The ascetic lifestyle he adopted put his very life in danger until “he found peace and comfort through faith in the grace of God through Jesus Christ.” 

      The clergy and even his own family opposed him. Kelly’s parents regarded his conversion as a calamity, and his mother exclaimed, “a change has taken place, but for the worse!” They were mortified that their only son, heir to the family estate, had stooped to unite himself with “Methodists and Swaddlers.” One biographer happily reports that, “After 

some time he gained universal recognition on account of his culture and thorough learning, but especially on account of his endearing personality, his sincere piety and humility, his charity work, and untiring zeal for the extension of the Kingdom of God.” 

      He was ordained in the Established Church in Ireland in 1792 and began to preach a clear gospel of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ. This soon upset Archbishop Fowler of Dublin, and both Kelly and his friend Rowland Hill were barred from preaching. This didn’t stop them, of course, and Kelly soon associated himself with the dissenters. Being a wealthy man, he was able to build chapels with his own money in Dublin (Blackrock), Portarlington, Athy, Wexford and Waterford. 

        In about 1800, Kelly married a Miss Tighe of Rosanna, Wicklow, who shared his spiritual views, and they had at least one child, a daughter. Then, in 1802, he published A Collection of Psalms and Hymns that included thirty-three of his own works. Over the next fifty years, he steadily added to his portfolio until, with the final edition of Hymns on Various Passages of Scripture in 1853, he filled out a volume with 765 of his own works. 

Kelly Memorial at Ballintubbert

     When a friend read “The Lord is my shepherd” as Kelly lay on his deathbed, his response was “The Lord is my everything.” He passed away on May 14, 1855 in Dublin, and was buried at Ballintubbert Church, just a few miles outside of Athy. 

        A few other notable hymns from Kelly’s pen include Look, ye saints, the sight is glorious; Meeting in the Saviour’s Name; Praise the Saviour, ye who know Him; and We’ll sing of the Shepherd that died. 

The Shroud of Turin

        “The Shroud of Turin is a length of linen cloth bearing the negative image of a man who is alleged to be Jesus of Nazareth…The cloth itself is believed by some to be the burial shroud that Jesus was wrapped in when he was buried after crucifixion.” Wikipedia article

        “It is first securely attested in 1390, when a local bishop wrote that the shroud was a forgery and that an unnamed artist had confessed.” Since then thousands of books and articles have been written, both approving and debunking its reality. 

        In a “view”, this author wants to suggest two logical reasons why it is unlikely to be the original burial cloth. Aside from all provenance and science, two Scriptural facts should be noted: 

1) There was a weight of 75 pounds of spices wrapped with the body [John 19:39] and 

2) The burial cloth did not cover the head [John 20:7]. 

       If the image was caused by radiation or some other form of brilliant exposure, there seems to be no sign of the spices, and secondly, the covering from the head was lying separately from the linen, not part of the shroud itself. Just a thought. ☺ 

        For anyone who would like to pursue this further, there is an amazingly thorough essay by Gary Habermas, available on the internet at www.garyhabermas.com. His article includes some excellent insights into the resurrection, as well as what he considers strong reasons why this might be the “true” shroud.

Apologetics: Crossing Jordan Dryshod

        After the two spies were helped by Rahab to escape from Jericho, they returned to Joshua and reported, “The Lord has surely given the whole land into our hands.” (Joshua 2:24) Early the next morning, the Israelites moved to the Jordan and camped there three days. On the fourth morning, Joshua had the priests carry the ark of the covenant and stand in the river. “As soon as the priests who carry the ark of the LORD—the Lord of all the earth—set foot in the Jordan, its waters flowing downstream will be cut off and stand up in a heap.” (Joshua 3:13) 

        The author’s comment at this point is that “the Jordan is at flood stage all during harvest,” (v.15) but the water from upstream did stop flowing. “It piled up in a heap a great distance away, at a town called Adam in the vicinity of Zarethan.” (v.16) As soon as all Israel had hurried over, Joshua called the priests up out of the river bed and “the waters of the Jordan returned to their place and ran at flood stage as before.” (v.18) 

        The period of the exodus is filled with miracles; some we may explain in a scientific sense, but many not. There is a geographical explanation in the drying up of Jordan but the geology and the perfect timing are entirely God’s doing. 

        Are there other passages of Scripture that bear on this event? Consider Psalm 114:3-7—the psalmist tells us that “the Jordan turned back, the mountains skipped like rams, the hills like lambs…tremble, O earth…” This was for real! This is a poetic description of a serious earthquake. 

        What is the geography of the Jordan at Adam near Zarethan? The site of “Adam” is considered to be about two kilometers downstream from the confluence of the Jabbok River with the Jordan, on the east side and about 27 kilometres north of Jericho. The “Adam Bridge” or “Damia Bridge” located here, is one of the few border crossings into the country of Jordan. It is here, too, that the river Jordan flows past the foot of barren hills that look just ready to crumble. In fact, “on July 11, 1927, an earthquake of magnitude 6.5 struck near Jericho, causing extensive damage in the town. Eighteen miles north of Jericho, near Adam, there was a mud slide which dammed the river, causing it to run dry for a short time. 

        Historical records tell us that larger mud slides have occurred in 1160, 1267, 1534, 1546, 1834 and 1906 and the average length of time during which the river was blocked was two days - ample time for all the Israelites to cross from one side to the other.” [info per http://www.diggingsonline.com/pages/rese/books/comment/joshua.htm]

A Taste of Apologetics: Salt

        In the Sermon on the Mount (Matt.5:13), Jesus refers to the possibility that "salt loses its saltiness." How could this be? Table salt, as we know it, is just sodium chloride (NaCl), with a little bit of iodide added. The taste comes from the sodium chloride and if that were removed, there would be nothing left. 

        So in what sense can salt lose its "saltiness"? Once again, we turn to Unger's Bible Dictionary for some guidance. Unger refers to salt and "its power to strengthen food and preserve it from putrefaction and corruption." In a figurative sense, salt symbolizes hospitality; grace in the heart (Mark 9:50); and wisdom or good sense in speech (Col.4:6). Unger also refers to "the belief that salt would, by exposure to the air, lose its virtue." But this is our question—how could sodium chloride lose its savour and still be there? Logically and chemically, this couldn't happen. So what is the explanation?

        For an answer to this we turn to Hard Sayings of the Bible, edited by Kaiser, Davids, Bruce, and Brauch:— “But how can salt lose its saltiness? If it is truly salt, of course, it must remain salt and retain its saltiness. But probably in the ordinary experience of Galilean life, salt was rarely found in a pure state; in practice it was mixed with other substances, various forms of earth. So long as the proportion of salt in the mixture was sufficiently high, the mixture would serve the purpose of true salt. But if, through exposure to damp or some other reason, all the salt in the mixture was leached out, what was left was good for nothing. 

        The Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds Commentary has several good comments but we will end by quoting just two of them: 

· Jesus may be alluding to rock formations that contained deposits of sodium chloride. Meat and fish were packed in these rocks to preserve them. After a period of time the salt leached out of the rocks, so the rocks were not good for anything and so thrown out.

· Jesus may be citing a well-known proverbial saying...Jesus may be using this expression to describe an equally impossible characteristic of his disciples. As they go out into the world as salt, the proof of the reality of their profession is in the nature of their lives. True disciples cannot lose what makes them disciples because they have become changed persons, made new by the life of the kingdom of heaven. However, imposter disciples have only an external flavoring. They cannot be made salty again, because they never had that kingdom life in the first place.

“Turtles All the Way Down!”

Everybody knows the story of the south sea islander who was asked what his island was resting on. He said it was on the back of a giant turtle. But what was that turtle on? —it was on an even bigger turtle—in fact it was “turtles all the way down!”

We laugh, and think, “How simple. How primitive.” There obviously couldn’t be an infinite progression of bigger and bigger turtles.

Wait a minute! Let’s re-think that in more modern, possibly more scientific terms. Where is his island? It’s the peak of a sea-mount, surrounded by water, on a globe just floating in space. It’s 8 light minutes from the sun, and 4.2 light years from the next sun (the star, Proxima Centauri). Astronomers tell us that the universe has been expanding for 14.8 billion years. But into what? What is beyond that? More stars? More turtles?! Nothing?

Maybe that islander wasn’t so far wrong. We really can’t come up with anything much better! Farther and farther stars (or three-dimensional space stretching to infinity) or more and more turtles, may not be so far-fetched.

And while we’re thinking along these lines, maybe we’re at the beginning of another infinity too. It could be that the ‘Big Bang’ started a fourth dimension as well—time! But that’s a whole other story.

Who wrote the First Letter of Peter?

       There is a man in the New Testament, whose name, in our modern terminology, was Simon Johnson. When he first met Jesus, at His baptism, he was ‘bar Jonas’ or ‘son of Jonah’ (hence ‘Johnson’). Jesus changed his name to ‘Peter’ that day, and ever since, we’ve known him as the Apostle Peter.

        I’ve been reading his story in the gospels, especially Mark, and in Acts. Now I’ve come to his first letter and I meet critics: ‘This letter was written too late in the first century. Peter was dead by this time.’ ‘This letter is too well written. Peter was only a fisherman.’ ‘Someone forged it in Peter’s name.’

        Well, I believe the critics are wrong. Peter may well have hidden himself in his own letter. His name is the very first word in the letter, and his identity might well show up in other places too. His subject matter is too high and holy. A forger could never have conceived it. Chapter one alone, talks about being sprinkled with Jesus’ blood (1:2), about a living hope (1:3), about an unfailing inheritance in heaven (1:3), about trials that prove our faith (1:7).

        Then he reaches the high point of worship of Jesus, the Living Stone (2:4). Peter knows that he, himself, is about to die by Nero’s orders. But look at the honour he confers on his readers. They will live on after Peter is gone; they will be little ‘living stones’. In fact, as his imitators, he might almost say they will be living ‘Peters’, for peter is a stone and a stone is Peter. His signature was there all the time.

        Bless Peter. Bless the Living Stone. Bless the Lord!

[See also 'The Painting and the Painter', elsewhere in this blog.]

Word Find: The Life of David

 

Crossword: Weapons in the Bible

Across

1. A woman cracked Abimelech's skull with one. 

 3. Used to beat Jesus over the head before his crucifixion. 

 5. Abraham was going to kill his son with this. 

 7. Samson struck down a thousand men with this. 

 10. These don't make leviathan flee and slingstones are like chaff to him. 

 12. These lefties could send a stone at a hair with this and not miss. 

 14. Believed to have been used against Jeremiah. 

 16. Jacob took a ridge of land from the Amorites with this. 

 18. Used to strike Israel's ruler on the cheek. 

 20. The Philistines charged the Israelites a third of a shekel to re-sharpen these. 21. Uzziah used these to hurl large stones. 

 22. The other half of the equipment used by Gideon to rout the Midianites.

Down

2. Goliath had one of these with a shaft like a weaver's rod. 

 4. Jael finished off Sisera with this in her tent. 

 6. The king of Babylon was about to set these against the gates of Jerusalem, to break them in. 

 8. A short, sharp, bronze throwing weapon carried by Goliath. 

 9. Half of the equipment used by Gideon to rout the Midianites. 

 11. Shamgar struck down 600 Philistines with this farming tool. 

 13. Used to take off the ear of the high priest's servant. 

 15. These came thick and fast at Paul and Stephen. 

 17. With the shield of faith we can quench these fiery things from the evil one. 

 19. The Lord used this weapon to drive the sheep and cattle from the temple area.

Crossword: Personalities from the Old Testament

Across



 4. He killed a lion in a pit on a snowy day. 2 Sam.23:20 

 6. She had weak eyes. Gen.29:17 

 7. A skillful hunter and a hungry but thoughtless man. Gen.25:27 

10. He shut the mouths of lions. Heb.11:33 

11. He drove like a madman, and deposed Jezebel. 2 Kings 9:20 

13. He and his house chose to serve the Lord. Josh.24:15 

15. The friend of God. Jas.2:23 

17. A king with a heart like God's. Acts 13:22. 

18. Moses' great-great-great grandfather. Ex.2:1 

19. We are children of this free woman. Gal.4:31

Down

   1. A priest of this god was Joseph's father-in-law. Gen.41:45 

   2. He threshed wheat in a winepress. Judg.8:11 

   3. They have rushed for profit in this man's error. Jude 11 

   4. The god of the Canaanites. 1 Kings 18:25 

   5. He held up Moses' arm during battle. Ex. 17:12 

   8. He asked for wisdom and knowledge but not wealth. 2 Chr.1:11 

   9. This man's hand was against everyone. Gen.16:12 

 10. A traitorous Edomite. 1 Sam.22:18 

 12. He walked through the fire. Dan.3:26 

 14. His name is Fool and folly goes with him.1 Sam.25:25 

 16. The humblest man on the face of the earth. Num.12:3

Figures of speech used in the Bible (8)

        When we finished (7) in this series, we had never heard the word ‘merism’, and even today it doesn’t show up in our Webster’s dictionary as a word in its own right. A search of Wikipedia indicates that the meaning is “the combination of two contrasting words, to refer to an entirety. For example, when we mean to say that someone searched thoroughly, everywhere, we often say that someone ‘searched high and low’. …Merisms also figure in a number of familiar English expressions. The phrase ‘lock, stock and barrel’ originally referred to the parts of a gun, by counting off several of its more conspicuous parts; it has come to refer to the whole of anything that has constituent parts. And we all know ‘hook, line, and sinker’! Basically, {the phrase} and everything in between— all-encompassing.” 

        “Merisms are conspicuous features of Biblical poetry. For example, in Genesis 1:1, when God creates ‘the heavens and the earth’, the two parts combine to indicate that God created the whole universe. Similarly, in Psalm 139:2, the psalmist declares that God knows ‘my downsitting and mine uprising’ , indicating that God knows all the psalmist's actions.’ [See Bruce Waltke (2007), A Commentary on Micah] 

        A few more examples  include, ‘from Dan to Beersheba’ [1 Sam.3:20], ‘from the sole of the foot to the top of the head’ [Isa.1:6], ‘the Alpha and the Omega’ [Rev.1:8], ‘in him are yea and in him amen’ [2 Cor.1:20], ‘from the rising of the sun to the place of its setting’ [Isa.45:6], ‘there was evening and there was morning—the first day’ [Gen.1:5], ‘flowing with milk and honey’ [Ex.3:8], ‘head or tail’ [Isa.19:15], ‘the First and the Last’ [Rev.22:13], and ‘the Beginning and the End’ [Rev.22:13]. 

Figures of Speech Used in the Bible (7)

        Acrostics are invaluable to every Sunday School teacher and youth worker at one time or another. The same is true of some Bible writers. One author, E.W.Bullinger, claims there are thirteen such constructions in the scriptures. Once again I went to my high school English textbook for a definition but this time there was no listing. Instead, Merriam-Webster gave me this answer for “acrostic”:— “a composition usually in verse in which sets of letters (as the initial or final letters of the lines) taken in order form a word or phrase or a regular sequence of letters of the alphabet.” 

        It's a sad fact that acrostics don't carry over in translation so our English Bible doesn't show them. The greatest acrostic in the Old Testament is probably Psalm 119, but the only indication we get is the Hebrew letters before each section. The Hebrew alphabet (I'm told) has 22 letters. Psalm 119 has those 22 letters indicated in many Bibles, and each of those letters is followed by eight verses. Each of those eight verses in turn starts with the Hebrew letter at its heading, Aleph, Beth, Gimel, etc. Bullinger has attempted a demonstration like so:— 

A 

Ah! The happinesses of the perfect...

Ah! The happinesses of the keeper…

Assuredly they have…

As to Thy commandments…

Ah! Lord…

Ashamed, then I…

All my heart…

All Thy statutes…

B

By what means…

By every means…

Besides, I have…

Etc., etc.

        An acrostic can serve at least three purposes— it can give a challenge to the “constructor”, it can give literary pleasure to the reader and it can show the completeness of the text. An acrostic is like a jigsaw puzzle—when a piece is missing, it's obvious. Psalm 145 is an acrostic. Again, each verse starts with the successive letters of the Hebrew alphabet but in the KJV, the letter Nun [“N”] is missing and so verse 13b is also missing. The NIV restores this verse, reading “The Lord is faithful to all his promises and loving toward all he has made.” 

      Just to note a few other instances, Proverbs 31:10-31 is “a perfect alphabetical acrostic, marking and calling our attention to this song of praise of a virtuous woman.” Other Psalms have acrostics too, as well as the first four chapters of Lamentations. According to Bullinger, there may even be acrostics spelling out the name of the Lord in the book of Esther. 

        According to Unger's Bible Dictionary, “the most famous of all ancient acrostics is the one used by ancient Christians as a secret symbol of faith. This is the Greek word ichthus, fish, formed from the initial letters of five titles of our Lord, 'Jesus Christ, God's Son, Saviour.' ” 

Figures of Speech Used in the Bible (6)

        Simply put, personification attributes intelligence to plants, to inanimate objects, and even to abstract ideas. As always with figures of speech, powerful images force their way into our thinking. And, as often happens, unbelievers wrest the images to strange ends. Because the scriptures say that 'the morning stars sang together', (Job 38:7) one commentator concluded that Christians think that all stars are living beings!

        Putting such simplistic thinking aside, we can get immense satisfaction from the imagery the Bible presents. For instance, God made two great lights, 'the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night.' Gen.1:16. Then, in Joseph‘s dream, 'my sheaf rose and stood upright, while your sheaves gathered around mine and bowed down to it.' Gen.37:7.

        Perhaps the most personifications in scripture are found in the Psalms: 'The heavens declare the glory of God.' Psa.19:1. 'Will the dust praise you?' Psa.30:9. 'Deep calls to deep in the roar of your waterfalls.' Psa.42:7. 'Send forth your light and your truth, let them guide me.' Psa.43:3. 'Why gaze in envy, O rugged mountains?' Psa.68:16. 'Righteousness and peace kiss each other.' Psa.85:10.

        A few other well-known personifications are 'the mountains and hills will burst into song before you and all the trees of the field will clap their hands' Isa.55:12; 'When the keepers of the house tremble.' Eccl.12:3; and 'Awake, O sword, against my shepherd.' Zech.13:7. 

        Moving into the New Testament, we read that Jesus 'rebuked the winds and the waves.' Mat.8:26. When the Pharisees asked Jesus to rebuke his disciples, He said, 'If they keep quiet, the stones will cry out.' Luke 19:40. One final example for now is Paul‘s statement in 1 Cor.15:26: 'The last enemy to be destroyed is death.'

Figures of Speech Used in the Bible (5)

        The most important and the commonest figure of speech is metaphor. Once again, my Grade 11 textbook comes in handy: ―"A metaphor states that a person or a thing is some other person or thing. 'That man is like a fox' is a simile. 'That man is a fox' is a metaphor. The metaphor is a briefer, stronger, and more vivid figure than a simile. It has become so common in speech that many ordinary expressions, originally metaphorical, have lost their metaphorical meaning, such as 'she dropped her eyes', 'fertile words', a 'harrowing experience'."

        There are so many metaphors in the Bible that one hardly knows where to begin. Let‘s start with Christ, Himself—He‘s 'the bright Morning Star.' Rev.22:16. 'The Lord is my rock, my fortress…my shield.' Psa.18:2. 'The Lord is my light and my salvation.' Psa.27:1. And remember 'a rose of Sharon, a lily of the valley.' Song 2:1.

        David condemns the guilty in Psa.5:9, by saying, 'Their throat is an open grave.' In Psa.40:3, he states, 'the poison of vipers is on their lips.'

        The New Testament is full of metaphors as well: 'You are the salt of the earth.' Matt.5:13. 'You are the light of the world.' Matt.5:14. 'You are God‘s field, God‘s building.' 1 Cor.3:9. 'I am the bread of life.' John 6:35. 'I am the gate for the sheep.' John 10:7. 'I am the way.' John 14:6.

        Jude gives a whole stream of metaphors: 'These men are…clouds without rain…autumn trees…wild waves of the sea…wandering stars. Jude 12,13. 

Figures of Speech Used in the Bible (4)

        Arguably the most frequent figure of speech in the Bible is simile. The dictionary definition is simple— “a figure of speech involving the comparison of one thing with another thing of a different kind, used to make a description more emphatic or vivid.” It is often introduced by like or as, occasionally by as if or than. In a sense the words ‘childlike’ and ‘lifelike’ are similes, and even the words ‘cowardly’ and ‘saintly’. 

     If you look up like and as in a concordance, there are hundreds of occurrences. A few examples are “manna…was white like coriander seed and tasted like wafers made with honey,” Ex.16:31. Goliath’s “spear shaft was like a weaver’s rod,” 1 Sam.17:7 and the king “will be like rain falling on a mown field.” Psa.72:6. Sometimes the challenge is to find exactly what the comparison is— How do wafers made with honey taste? How big was a weaver’s rod? How is the king like rain? 

        An Old Testament example using than would be “wash me, and I will be whiter than snow,” Psa.51:7. 

    Of course, there are countless beautiful similes in the New Testament too: “He saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove.” Mat.3:16. “He was led like a sheep to the slaughter.” Acts 8:32. “Our lowly bodies…will be like his glorious body.” Php 3:21, and “the builder of a house has greater honour than the house itself.” Heb.3:3.